Set in motion.

Is it a blatant lie if one said that he had subconsciously done something without knowing e reason why he did it? However himself know that e contents contain damning stuff? There was an earlier act of concealment which proved that he was guilty of hiding, of course it can be argued that it was for other matters. The strangest part was whatever happened before, portrayed a different story from e current. One was led to believe that e so called perpetrator was e only one creating trouble all along & sorely missed out e fact that ' it always take two hands to clap'. Took a deep breath.

It was taken that all communications are to be ceased, in which failure will end this union. The benefit of doubt has its own limitations & time. While e boundaries of trust are redrawn, one can only pray that it will work out.

If faith is never enough, what else then?